As a political scientist with a background in policy analysis, I used to approach questions about policy plans in terms of which had data behind them and which didn鈥檛 鈥 along with what such evidence might mean for decision-makers.
However, no question about what a new Donald Trump administration would mean for U.S. education can be answered strictly with a debate about facts and figures.
With the former president and his allies still the 2020 election, with Trump and his running mate embracing unfounded stories about eating household pets and with Trump鈥檚 , any analytical projection about his future agenda is all but impossible. With such an absence of facts or evidence-based policy designs, we must turn to past actions, current rhetoric and the priorities of Trump鈥檚 political alliances for a hint of what could come.
On that basis, we could expect more debates about and , more inexplicable musings about whether for enslaved Americans, more spending of scarce resources to put and more singling out of kids because of their .
Related: Become a lifelong learner. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter to receive our comprehensive reporting directly in your inbox.
Many Republican proposals , starting with Project 2025 鈥 the policy agenda assembled by the conservative Heritage Foundation for a new Trump term. Although Trump that controversial document speaks for his candidacy, of the first Trump team had a hand in its crafting.
The key education points in the platform Trump does claim as his own 鈥 the so-called Agenda47 and the GOP party platform 鈥 strike the same notes of emphasis as those in Project 2025. Indeed, the one-page education 鈥渃hapter鈥 is all but a summary of its much larger Project 2025 counterpart.
What do they emphasize? Culture wars, school vouchers and a peculiar fixation on ending the federal Department of Education.
OPINION: I鈥檇 love to predict what a Kamala Harris presidency might mean for education, but we don鈥檛 have enough information
Two of the first three paragraphs of Project 2025鈥檚 education plan call for universal school vouchers. In Trump鈥檚 official GOP party platform, universal vouchers are the second education agenda item, behind a call to end teacher tenure. Both items follow a general statement about making great schools.
And yet, private school vouchers are not only eating up of state budgets, some states are now directly for private schools to receive those vouchers. These schools are on admissions and expulsion decisions across a variety of child characteristics.
The education bullet point in of the Trump platform 鈥 the highlights of the highlights 鈥 excludes any specific policy statements, simply reading in its entirety:
Cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children.
Such a call echoes that of head of the Heritage Foundation, in his . In that section, after setting a new litmus test for all conservative presidential candidates to support universal vouchers, Roberts insists:
The noxious tenets of 鈥渃ritical race theory鈥 and 鈥済ender ideology鈥 should be excised from curricula in every public school in the country. These theories poison our children.
Then there are the statements Trump and his allies make every day, including calls to end the . A similar demand is in the very first paragraph of Project 2025鈥檚 education chapter, just ahead of its demands for vouchers.
Moms for Liberty co-founder , who hosted a 鈥溾 with Trump in August, has said on X (formerly Twitter) that Trump is 鈥溾 about ending the department, and that she 鈥渉ope[s] to get to help him accomplish this goal,鈥 perhaps as for that agency.
She could have competition. Two weeks before Trump鈥檚 appearance for Moms for Liberty, former U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos that she would consider joining a second Trump administration if it were for the specific task of eliminating the department she led in the first Trump term.
Let鈥檚 be clear: The U.S. Department of Education does many things, but what really riles up the Trumpian right is its role as the chief for American schools. And that鈥檚 why it鈥檚 been singled out by the right for special criticism.
So what does all of this actually mean for kids and families?
What is the common theme of attacks on gender ideology, diversity and racial justice in schools; demands for universal vouchers; and calls to end the federal education agency?
If policy proposals, like budgets, are moral documents, what unifies the possibilities of a new Trump term 鈥 whether laid out in Project 2025, the GOP platform, Agenda 47 or campaign speeches on the trail 鈥 into some statement of purpose?
I say it鈥檚 this: A new Trump presidency would usher in an era of isolation and separatism and a casting out of children who differ from their peers or from what Christian Nationalists believe America should look like beyond what we all share as human beings. As just one example: Voucher schemes, like those prioritized by Trump and his allies, have been used by the right to children and families to what the right calls the 鈥渆ducation freedom鈥 and 鈥溾 represented by such 鈥渟cholarships.鈥
What, if not a Trump-inspired , explains the Trumpian right鈥檚 current obsession with the names children use to or how they describe the they carry and experience?
Yet presidents only have partial control over which specific plans For that reason, considering a new Trump term is as much about the broader political coalition he leads as what Trump and his team could personally do in the education policy arena.
So, from all of this, and regardless of what policies actually pass, we can be sure that a Trump victory would extend the era of culture warring in American education.
For nearly a decade in political life, Donald Trump has told us who he is. When it comes to any education ideas he and his allies might have, my humble suggestion is that we finally listen to what he has said, and consider what he has already done.
Josh Cowen is a professor of education policy at Michigan State University and a senior fellow at the Education Law Center. He鈥檚 the author .鈥
Contact the opinion editor at opinion@hechingerreport.org.
This story about Donald Trump鈥檚 education policies was produced by 福利姬视频, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for Hechinger鈥檚 weekly newsletter.